AUDI A5 Sportback (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,573kg3,468lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 126.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 125.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 38.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 1,404km873mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,733mm186in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,824mm111in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 480L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 38.6 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
Although Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI has more power, AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 889 km 552 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 1,404 km 873 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Is 53 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 515 km (320 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1,077 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























