Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsAUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Sportback (F5)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,520 kg3,351 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best estimated range1,219 km758 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,647kg3,631lb | 1,520kg3,351lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 2,125kg4,685lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 134.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 126.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.8s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,219km758mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,733mm186in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,386mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,824mm111in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.8 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,219 km 758 mi |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | 1,520 kg 3,351 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,219 km 758 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI | AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 330 km (205 mi) more estimated range
- Has 145 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 127 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























