Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsAUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Sportback (F5)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,541 kg3,397 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Best estimated range1,119 km695 mi
- Largest trunk563 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,541kg3,397lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 119.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 37.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,733mm186in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,386mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,836mm112in | 2,824mm111in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 480L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 37.9 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 64 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 3 km (2 mi) more estimated range
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 40 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























