AUDI A5 Sportback (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDIvsKia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKia Stinger
2.2 CRDi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,234 km767 mi
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,774kg3,911lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 116.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 126.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.8s Calculated | 42.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,234km767mi Calculated | 938km583mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,199cc134cu in |
| Length | 4,733mm186in | 4,830mm190in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,386mm55in | 1,400mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,824mm111in | 2,905mm114in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,596mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,619mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 406L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,114L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 169g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 3,800 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.8 s | 42.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW |
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi has 10 hp more than AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 1,774 kg 3,911 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 7.6 s |
Although Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi has more power, AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI and Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 1,234 km 767 mi |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 938 km 583 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI | KiaStinger2.2 CRDi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,774 kg 3,911 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,234 km 767 mi | 938 km 583 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 169 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 406 L 14.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI | Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Sportback (F5) 2.0 TDI
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 297 km (184 mi) more estimated range
- Has 74 L more trunk volume
- Emits 45 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Kia Stinger 2.2 CRDi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























