BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) · Facelift 2017 420dvsAUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Coupe (F5)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range1,213 km754 mi
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score53/100
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI
- Largest trunk450 L
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 93.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 90.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,213km754mi Calculated | 1,115km693mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,640mm183in | 4,673mm184in |
| Width | 1,825mm72in | 1,846mm73in |
| Height | 1,392mm55in | 1,371mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,764mm109in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,587mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,589mm63in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d and AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 1,213 km 754 mi |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 1,115 km 693 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017420d | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,213 km 754 mi | 1,115 km 693 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d | AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) Facelift 2017 420d
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 97 km (61 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 40 TDI
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























