AUDI A5 Coupe (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSIvsBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Coupe (F32)
430i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
- Largest trunk465 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score54/100
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range923 km574 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 252hp188kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 921km572mi Calculated | 923km574mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,673mm184in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,371mm54in | 1,377mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,764mm109in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 465L | 445L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 5,200 rpm | 1,450-4,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 252 hp 188 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 5.8 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI and BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 921 km 572 mi |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 923 km 574 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 252 hp 188 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 252 hp 188 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Coupe (F5)2.0 TFSI | BMW4 Series Coupe (F32)430i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 252 hp 188 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 921 km 572 mi | 923 km 574 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 465 L 16.4 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI | BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Coupe (F5) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
BMW 4 Series Coupe (F32) 430i
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 2 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























