AUDI A5 Avant (B10)
Car comparison
AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) · Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) · Facelift 2011
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range940 km584 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score89/100
AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Largest trunk448 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,375kg5,236lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 98.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.0s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 709km440mi Calculated | 940km584mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,829mm190in | 4,626mm182in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,854mm73in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,383mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,892mm114in | 2,751mm108in |
| Front track | 1,618mm64in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 448L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,396L | 750L |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 3,900-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.0 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI has 26 hp more than AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI: 26 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 7.6 s |
Although AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI has more power, AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 709 km 440 mi |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 940 km 584 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA5 Avant (B10)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA5 Cabriolet (8F7)Facelift 20112.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 709 km 440 mi | 940 km 584 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 448 L 15.8 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A5 Avant (B10) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 128 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
AUDI A5 Cabriolet (8F7) Facelift 2011 2.0 TFSI
- Has 26 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 105 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 231 km (144 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























