AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30VvsBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Sedan (E36)
328i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score72/100
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range765 km475 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,440kg3,175lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 25.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 577km358mi Calculated | 765km475mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,793cc170cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,393mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,607mm103in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,408mm55in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,421mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 5,500 rpm | 3,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 25.4 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 7.3 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i and AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 577 km 358 mi |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 765 km 475 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | BMW3 Series Sedan (E36)328i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 577 km 358 mi | 765 km 475 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V | BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW 3 Series Sedan (E36) 328i
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























