AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D)
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30VvsAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
2.8 V6 30V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range729 km453 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,285kg2,833lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.1s Calculated | 25.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 729km453mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,771cc169cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,479mm176in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,733mm68in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,607mm103in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,479mm58in | 1,477mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 440L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD: Power / Torque
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V AWD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.1 s | 25.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 193 hp 144 kW |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 193 hp 144 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD and AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V AWD: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 729 km 453 mi |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VAWD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 729 km 453 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 18.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,730 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V FWD
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V AWD
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























