AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) · Facelift 2016 35 TDIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions120 g/km
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Best estimated range1,319 km820 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,577kg3,477lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | - |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 83.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.6s Calculated | 64.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 95hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,087km675mi Calculated | 1,319km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,313mm170in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,785mm70in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 236L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 120g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 3,750 rpm | 1,740-3,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.6 s | 64.4 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 8.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 1,087 km 675 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,319 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sportback (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,577 kg 3,477 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,087 km 675 mi | 1,319 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 120 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 236 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 95 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sportback (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 212 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 144 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























