AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions111 g/km
- Best estimated range1,333 km828 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score73/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,235kg4,927lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,333km828mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | - |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 845L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 56L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 111g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,333 km 828 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,333 km 828 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 111 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























