AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 35 TDIvsAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
35 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 106.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 46.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,423mm174in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,793mm71in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,409mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 320L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 121g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 46.2 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 8.1 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TDI | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 121 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























