AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDIvsBMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 420d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 4 Series Convertible (F33)
420d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range1,122 km697 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score50/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 105.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.4s Calculated | 36.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,122km697mi Calculated | 1,118km694mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,421mm174in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,384mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,810mm111in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 220L |
| Max trunk volume | 678L | 370L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 133g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 420d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.4 s | 36.5 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI and BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 420d: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,122 km 697 mi |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 1,118 km 694 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)2.0 TDI | BMW4 Series Convertible (F33)420d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,122 km 697 mi | 1,118 km 694 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 133 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI | BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 420d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW 4 Series Convertible (F33) 420d
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























