AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score70/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,395 kg3,075 lb
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,395kg3,075lb | 1,395kg3,075lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,945kg4,288lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 105.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.7s Calculated | 36.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 108hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km597mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,456mm175in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,796mm71in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,416mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,637mm104in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,526mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 390L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 845L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.7 s | 36.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 8.9 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 962 km 597 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | 1,395 kg 3,075 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 597 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 108 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 138 km (86 mi) more estimated range
- Has 105 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























