AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsOpel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOpel Astra K
1.6 EcoTec
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,255 kg2,767 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions132 g/km
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,255kg2,767lb | 1,275kg2,811lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 78.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 862km536mi Calculated | 787km489mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,485mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,662mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 370L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | 1,210L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 132g/km | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 4,700-5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,700 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 200 hp 149 kW |
Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec has 10 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.8 s |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 7.0 s |
Although Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 862 km 536 mi |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 787 km 489 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | OpelAstra K1.6 EcoTec | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb | 1,275 kg 2,811 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 862 km 536 mi | 787 km 489 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 132 g/km | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 75 km (47 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Opel Astra K 1.6 EcoTec
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























