AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,285 kg2,833 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions108 g/km
- Best estimated range1,220 km758 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,285kg2,833lb |
| Gross weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.6s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 1,220km758mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 320L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 108g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.6 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 820 km 509 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,220 km 758 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.3 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,285 kg 2,833 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 1,220 km 758 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 108 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 7.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,076 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 400 km (248 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 30 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























