AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
RS 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t99 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,932kg4,259lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 88.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 34.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,448mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 34.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 80 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 265 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























