AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsAUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) · Facelift 2024 40 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) · Facelift 2024
40 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score65/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 56.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 26.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,504mm177in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,427mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 235L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 26.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 201 hp 150 kW |
AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI has 17 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 Sedan (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 445 km (277 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
AUDI A3 Sedan (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























