AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) · Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultravsAUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,295kg2,855lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.5s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km597mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,423mm174in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,793mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 680L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.5 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 8.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 962 km 597 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Cabriolet (8V)Facelift 20161.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 597 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Cabriolet (8V) Facelift 2016 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 175 km (109 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























