AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk390 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score70/100
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 76.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 932km579mi Calculated | 1,170km727mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 390L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 845L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI has 6 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 932 km 579 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,170 km 727 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.2 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 932 km 579 mi | 1,170 km 727 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 390 L 13.8 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 238 km (148 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























