AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
1.8 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions131 g/km
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score65/100
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.1s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,100km684mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,060L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.1 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 6.7 s |
Although AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 6.7 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,100 km 684 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 254 km (158 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 18 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























