AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSIvsInfiniti Q30 2.2 CDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonInfiniti Q30
2.2 CDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Largest trunk430 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score76/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,485kg3,274lb |
| Gross weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 2,020kg4,453lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 90.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.5s Calculated | 41.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,241mm167in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,777mm70in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,424mm56in | 1,495mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,602mm102in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,572mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,573mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 116g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 3,400-4,000 rpm | 1,400-3,400 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.5 s | 41.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI has 20 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI and Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 8.1 s |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 8.3 s |
Although Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI has more power, AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI and Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20161.5 TFSI | InfinitiQ302.2 CDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 116 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI | Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 1.5 TFSI
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Infiniti Q30 2.2 CDI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 136 km (85 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























