AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) · Facelift 2016 35 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
1.4 TFSI COD ultra
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Best economy score94/100
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.9s Calculated | 39.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 980km609mi Calculated | 1,064km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,458mm176in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,637mm104in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,100L |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 117g/km | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.9 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra and AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 980 km 609 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 1,064 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sedan (8V)Facelift 201635 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.4 TFSI COD ultra | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 980 km 609 mi | 1,064 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 117 g/km | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sedan (8V) Facelift 2016 35 TFSI
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.4 TFSI COD ultra
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 km (52 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























