AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 3.2 V6vsSubaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru WRX STI Hatchback
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.0 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range638 km397 mi
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | - |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 68.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.7s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 166hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 638km397mi Calculated | 566km352mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 2,457cc150cu in |
| Length | 4,238mm167in | 4,415mm174in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,795mm71in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,530mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 1,130L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,010L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,200 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-6,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.7 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 165 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 has 50 hp more than AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6 and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 6.4 s |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6 and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 638 km 397 mi |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 566 km 352 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.4 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20083.2 V6 | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 638 km 397 mi | 566 km 352 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6 | Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 3.2 V6
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 850 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























