AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions117 g/km
- Best estimated range1,136 km706 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,295kg2,855lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 41.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 1,136km706mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,214mm166in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,011L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 117g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 41.8 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI has 50 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 7.0 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 1,136 km 706 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.0 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 1,136 km 706 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 117 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI
- Has 50 hp more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 135 kg lighter
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 455 km (282 mi) more estimated range
- Has 84 L more trunk volume
- Emits 92 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























