AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V)
1.8 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range893 km555 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score67/100
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 893km555mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,214mm166in | 4,237mm167in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,601mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 187g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 893 km 555 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.9 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20052.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)1.8 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 893 km 555 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 187 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2005 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) 1.8 TFSI
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 58 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























