AUDI A3 (8P)
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSIvsHonda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHonda Civic Type R (EP3)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score66/100
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 196Nm145lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,204kg2,654lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 70.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 26.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 562km349mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,203mm165in | 4,135mm163in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,695mm67in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,472mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,517mm60in | 1,487mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 315L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,100L | 610L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 185g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 7,400 rpm | 5,900 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 26.6 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 6.9 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 and AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI and Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 562 km 349 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.9 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)2.0 TFSI | HondaCivic Type R (EP3)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 196 Nm 145 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 562 km 349 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 185 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI | Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 84 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 152 km (95 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Honda Civic Type R (EP3) 2.0
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























