AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
AUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score66/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,955kg4,310lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,238mm167in | 4,241mm167in |
| Width | 1,765mm69in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,421mm56in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,602mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,507mm59in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 131g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI has 16 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 6.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 764 km 475 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 131 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























