AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) · Facelift 2024 40 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8P) · Facelift 2008
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score72/100
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight141 hp/t105 kW/t7.1 kg/hp
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,985kg4,376lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 76.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.2s Calculated | 27.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,352mm171in | 4,238mm167in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,765mm69in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,421mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,635mm104in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,554mm61in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,507mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 325L | 280L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,145L | 1,010L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.2 s | 27.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI has 4 hp more than AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 6.3 s |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 753 km 468 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA3 Sportback (8Y)Facelift 202440 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8P)Facelift 20082.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A3 Sportback (8Y) Facelift 2024 40 TFSI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
AUDI A3 (8P) Facelift 2008 2.0 TFSI
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























