AUDI A1 Sportback (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful207 hp154 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score72/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Lightest1,255 kg2,767 lb
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Largest trunk365 L
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,290kg2,844lb | 1,255kg2,767lb |
| Gross weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.4s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,029mm159in | 4,241mm167in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,409mm55in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,563mm101in | 2,602mm102in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 365L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,090L | 1,100L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 132g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.4 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 207 hp 154 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI has 17 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 714 km 444 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 207 hp 154 kW | 6.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.8 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 Sportback (GB)40 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb | 1,255 kg 2,767 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 132 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 Sportback (GB) 40 TFSI
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























