Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.0 D4vsAUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 Sportback (8X)
1.4 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,395 km867 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score78/100
AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful185 hp138 kW
- Lightest1,290 kg2,844 lb
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.0 D4 | AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 185hp138kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,379kg3,040lb | 1,290kg2,844lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 30.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,395km867mi Calculated | 763km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 3,954mm156in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,742mm69in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,422mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,469mm97in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,477mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | 1,471mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 270L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 6,200 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.0 D4 | AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 30.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 185 hp 138 kW |
AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI has 8 hp more than Volvo V40 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 1.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,395 km 867 mi |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 763 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 185 hp 138 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.0 D4 | AUDIA1 Sportback (8X)1.4 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 185 hp 138 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | 1,290 kg 2,844 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,395 km 867 mi | 763 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 | AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 150 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 633 km (393 mi) more estimated range
- Has 226 L more trunk volume
- Emits 25 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
AUDI A1 Sportback (8X) 1.4 TFSI
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























