AUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSIvsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,154 km717 mi
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,578kg3,479lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 91.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.4s Calculated | 55.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | 1,154km717mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,046mm159in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,756mm69in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.4 s | 55.1 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 141 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 has 27 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 has more power, AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 741 km 460 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 1,154 km 717 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,578 kg 3,479 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | 1,154 km 717 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 373 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 D4
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 413 km (257 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























