DS 4 Crossback
Car comparison
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THPvsAUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
35 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque285 Nm210 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Largest trunk359 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score76/100
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 85.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,284mm169in | 4,046mm159in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,756mm69in |
| Height | 1,535mm60in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,612mm103in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 359L | 335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP has 60 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 8.4 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
Although DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP has more power, AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 359 L 12.7 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 276 km (172 mi) more estimated range
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 182 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























