AUDI A1 (8X)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A1 citycarver (GB)
35 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Lightest1,200 kg2,646 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk335 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score75/100
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful256 hp191 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight184 hp/t137 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 256hp191kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,200kg2,646lb |
| Gross weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.4s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 86.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.6s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 523km325mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 3,987mm157in | 4,046mm159in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,756mm69in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,469mm97in | 2,566mm101in |
| Front track | 1,463mm58in | 1,523mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,450mm57in | 1,505mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 860L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.6 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI has 106 hp more than AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: 106 hp (79 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI: 2.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI and AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 523 km 325 mi |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 256 hp 191 kW | 5.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 (8X)2.0 TFSI | AUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 256 hp 191 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,200 kg 2,646 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 523 km 325 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 (8X) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 106 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 2.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A1 citycarver (GB) 35 TFSI
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
- Emits 75 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























