Aston Martin V12 Vanquish
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C215) · Facelift 2002
AMG CL 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best economy score71/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed306 km/h190 mph
- Lightest1,835 kg4,045 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 466hp347kW | 500hp373kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 81.1s99% target: 303 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.7L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 254hp/t189kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,665mm184in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 88L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 317g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 5,000 rpm | 2,750 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 466 hp 347 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8 has 34 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 5.0 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8 and Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | 466 hp 347 kW | 5.0 s | 306 km/h 190 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 Vanquish6.0 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)Facelift 2002AMG CL 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 466 hp 347 kW | 500 hp 373 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 306 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.2 L/100 km 17.8 mpg US 21.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 317 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 254 hp/t 189 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,465 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Vanquish 6.0 V12
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 41 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) Facelift 2002 AMG CL 55 V8
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 300 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























