Aston Martin Vanquish III
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12vsLotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Eletre
X H1000 2.0L
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.3 s
- Fastest top speed345 km/h214 mph
- Highest torque1,000 Nm738 lb-ft
- Lightest1,910 kg4,211 lb
- Best power-to-weight437 hp/t326 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score93/100
Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L
- Most powerful952 hp710 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best overall score79/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 835hp623kW | 952hp710kW |
| Torque | 1,000Nm738lb-ft | 935Nm690lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 2,615kg5,765lb |
| Top speed | 345 km/h 214 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 47.9s99% target: 342 km/h / 212 mph Calculated | 30.7s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.3s | 3.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.6s Calculated | 11.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.2s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.7s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 437hp/t326kW/t198hp/1000 lb Calculated | 364hp/t271kW/t165hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 524Nm/t350lb-ft/ton Calculated | 358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 599km372mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 1,974cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,850mm191in | 5,103mm201in |
| Width | 2,044mm80in | 2,019mm79in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,636mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,885mm114in | 3,019mm119in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,670mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 248L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.2 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.3 s | 3.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.6 s | 11.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 27.7 s | - |
| Top speed | 345 km/h 214 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 227 km/h 141 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 835 hp 623 kW |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 952 hp 710 kW |
Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L has 117 hp more than Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12 and Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L: 117 hp (87 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 935 Nm 690 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 345 km/h 214 mph |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 3.3 s |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 3.3 s |
Although Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L has more power, Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L and Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12: 6.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 599 km 372 mi |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 835 hp 623 kW | 3.3 s | 345 km/h 214 mph |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 952 hp 710 kW | 3.3 s | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 |
| 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 3.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish III5.2 V12 | LotusEletreX H1000 2.0L | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 835 hp 623 kW | 952 hp 710 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,000 Nm 738 lb-ft | 935 Nm 690 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.3 s | 3.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 345 km/h 214 mph | Unrestricted 245 km/h152 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 2,615 kg 5,765 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 599 km 372 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 248 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 437 hp/t 326 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 364 hp/t 271 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12 | Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.97 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,596 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish III 5.2 V12
- Has 65 Nm more
- Is 705 kg lighter
- Has 100 km/h (62 mph) higher top speed
- Has 73 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lotus Eletre X H1000 2.0L
- Has 117 hp more
- Uses 6.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























