Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsSpyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSpyker C8 Preliator
4.2 V8 40V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed323 km/h201 mph
- Most powerful577 hp430 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577hp430kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.2s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph Calculated | 49.6s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 332hp/t247kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 432Nm/t289lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km379mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 4,172cc255cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,628mm182in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,953mm77in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,202mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,725mm107in |
| Front track | - | 1,625mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,645mm65in |
| Trunk volume | - | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 298g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,650 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 71.3 s | - |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 130 mph | 215 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 52 hp more than Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V.
The biggest power difference is between Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 3.8 s |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 3.7 s |
Although Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has more power, Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW | 3.8 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp 430 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 379 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 298 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Is 349 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























