Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsJaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe
R 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions269 g/km
- Best estimated range619 km385 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed323 km/h201 mph
- Most powerful577 hp430 kW
- Best power-to-weight332 hp/t247 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577hp430kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph Calculated | 62.0s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 332hp/t247kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km379mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,321mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | - | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,628mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 315L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 407L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 298g/km | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,650 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 11.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 71.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 27 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 3.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 4.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 609 km 379 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW | 3.8 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | JaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp 430 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 379 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 298 g/km | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 | Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe R 5.0 V8
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























