Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster · Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8vsLotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus 3-Eleven
Road 3.5 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Lightest925 kg2,039 lb
- Best power-to-weight450 hp/t335 kW/t2.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful436 hp325 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Best economy score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 436hp325kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 925kg2,039lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 39.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 450hp/t335kW/t204hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 443Nm/t297lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,735cc289cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | - |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,270mm50in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | - |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 144L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 296g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
- Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 7,300 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,550 rpm |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 9.3 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 7.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 10.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 436 hp 325 kW |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8 has 20 hp more than Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 925 kg 2,039 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 4.8 s |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 3.4 s |
Although Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8 has more power, Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 450 hp/t 335 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | 436 hp 325 kW | 4.8 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | 416 hp 310 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 2008N430 4.7 V8 | Lotus3-ElevenRoad 3.5 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 436 hp 325 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 925 kg 2,039 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 296 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 144 L 5.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 450 hp/t 335 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2008 N430 4.7 V8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Lotus 3-Eleven Road 3.5 V6
- Is 765 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 192 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























