Maserati MCPURA Cielo
Car comparison
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6vsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
F1 Edition 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful630 hp470 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight404 hp/t301 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score95/100
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range629 km391 mi
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630hp470kW | 535hp399kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 41.7s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 51.2s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.6s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 404hp/t301kW/t183hp/1000 lb Calculated | 325hp/t243kW/t148hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated | 416Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 513km319mi Calculated | 629km391mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,000cc183cu in | - |
| Length | 4,667mm184in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,965mm77in | - |
| Height | 1,214mm48in | 1,274mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,704mm106in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,648mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 100L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.6 s | 10.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 26.1 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 235 km/h 146 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW |
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 has 95 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8 and Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 2.9 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 513 km 319 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 629 km 391 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 630 hp 470 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 535 hp 399 kW | 3.7 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiMCPURA Cielo3.0 V6 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterF1 Edition 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp 470 kW | 535 hp 399 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 305 km/h 190 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 513 km 319 mi | 629 km 391 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 404 hp/t 301 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 325 hp/t 243 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6 | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati MCPURA Cielo 3.0 V6
- Has 95 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 79 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster F1 Edition 4.0 V8
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























