Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster · Facelift 2024 4.0 V8vsMcLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 750S Spider
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed345 km/h214 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best estimated range634 km394 mi
- Largest trunk200 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score29/100
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful750 hp559 kW
- Lightest1,438 kg3,170 lb
- Best power-to-weight522 hp/t389 kW/t1.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 665hp496kW | 750hp559kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,438kg3,170lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 345 km/h214 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.0s99% target: 342 km/h / 212 mph Calculated | 37.3s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s Calculated | 7.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 399hp/t298kW/t181hp/1000 lb Calculated | 522hp/t389kW/t237hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 480Nm/t321lb-ft/ton Calculated | 556Nm/t372lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | 590km367mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 3,994cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,495mm177in | 4,569mm180in |
| Width | - | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,196mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,705mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,680mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 94mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 200L | 58L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,750-6,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 30.5 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 345 km/h214 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 665 hp 496 kW |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW |
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 has 85 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8 and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | Unrestricted 345 km/h214 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 332 km/h 206 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 399 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 634 km 394 mi |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 590 km 367 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 665 hp 496 kW | 3.6 s | Unrestricted 345 km/h214 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW | 2.8 s | 332 km/h 206 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | 399 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage RoadsterFacelift 20244.0 V8 | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 665 hp 496 kW | 750 hp 559 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 345 km/h214 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 332 km/h 206 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | 590 km 367 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 58 L 2.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 399 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8 | McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 21.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,203 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster Facelift 2024 4.0 V8
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 44 km (27 mi) more estimated range
- Has 142 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Has 85 hp more
- Is 227 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 122 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























