Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsAston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t249 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions245 g/km
- Best estimated range695 km432 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score79/100
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed323 km/h201 mph
- Most powerful577 hp430 kW
- Best practicality score40/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577hp430kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 685Nm505lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 1,530kg3,373lb |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph Calculated | 50.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 332hp/t247kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 333hp/t249kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 448Nm/t300lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km379mi Calculated | 695km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,465mm176in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,704mm106in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 73L |
| CO2 emissions | 298g/km | 245g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,650 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 10.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 71.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 67 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 67 hp (50 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
Although Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has more power, Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 333 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 609 km 379 mi |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 695 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW | 3.8 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.6 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 333 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp 430 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 379 mi | 695 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 298 g/km | 245 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 333 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 | Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 67 hp more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 209 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 53 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























