Aston Martin V8 Vantage
Car comparison
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8vsAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster
4.3 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque685 Nm505 lb-ft
- Lightest1,530 kg3,373 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t249 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 685Nm505lb-ft | 410Nm302lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,530kg3,373lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.9s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 71.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 333hp/t249kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 448Nm/t300lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 695km432mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 4,281cc261cu in |
| Length | 4,465mm176in | 4,383mm173in |
| Width | 1,942mm76in | 1,866mm73in |
| Height | 1,273mm50in | 1,255mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,704mm106in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,568mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,562mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 245g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 385 hp 287 kW |
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 has 125 hp more than Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V and Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8: 125 hp (93 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 and Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 333 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.6 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | 385 hp 287 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV8 Vantage4.0 V8 | Aston MartinV8 Vantage Roadster4.3 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 685 Nm 505 lb-ft | 410 Nm 302 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,530 kg 3,373 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 695 km 432 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 245 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 333 hp/t 249 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V8 Vantage 4.0 V8
- Has 125 hp more
- Has 275 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 88 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Aston Martin V8 Vantage Roadster 4.3 i V8 32V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























