Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster
Car comparison
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12vsMcLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 650S Spider
3.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Highest torque678 Nm500 lb-ft
- Lightest1,468 kg3,236 lb
- Best power-to-weight443 hp/t330 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions275 g/km
- Best estimated range615 km382 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score75/100
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 573hp427kW | 650hp485kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 678Nm500lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,468kg3,236lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 50.3s99% target: 326 km/h / 202 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 8.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22.5L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 344hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated | 443hp/t330kW/t201hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 462Nm/t309lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,385mm173in | 4,512mm178in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,203mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | - |
| Front track | 1,570mm62in | 1,656mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 343g/km | 275g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 46.6 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 6.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 8.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 10.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8 has 77 hp more than Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12 and McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8: 77 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 1,468 kg 3,236 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 329 km/h 204 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8 and Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 544 km 338 mi |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.0 s | 329 km/h 204 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinV12 Vantage RoadsterS 6.0 V12 | McLaren650S Spider3.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 573 hp 427 kW | 650 hp 485 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,468 kg 3,236 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 343 g/km | 275 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 344 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 443 hp/t 330 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12 | McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 20.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 3,071 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin V12 Vantage Roadster S 6.0 V12
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
McLaren 650S Spider 3.8 V8
- Has 77 hp more
- Has 58 Nm more
- Is 197 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 99 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 68 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























