Aston Martin Rapide AMR
Car comparison
Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12vsIM L6 · Facelift 2025 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonIM L6 · Facelift 2025
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Most powerful787 hp587 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight350 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Lightest1,990 kg4,387 lb
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 603hp450kW | 787hp587kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.2s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 36.4s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 2.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 9.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 2.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 10.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | - |
| Length | 5,019mm198in | 4,937mm194in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,960mm77in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,474mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,989mm118in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,672mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 457L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 91L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 2.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 2.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 9.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 70.4 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 10.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 210 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 603 hp 450 kW |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW |
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh has 184 hp more than Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12 and IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh: 184 hp (137 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 268 km/h 167 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 4.4 s |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 2.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12: 1.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | 603 hp 450 kW | 4.4 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW | 2.7 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12 | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 603 hp 450 kW | 787 hp 587 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 2.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 268 km/h 167 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,990 kg 4,387 lb | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 457 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Rapide AMR 6.0 V12
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 62 km/h (39 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh
- Has 184 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























