Aston Martin DBX
Car comparison
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8vsTesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model Y
Performance 80.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,995 kg4,398 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score87/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score91/100
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 534hp398kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | - |
| Curb weight | 2,245kg4,949lb | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 35.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | - |
| Length | 5,039mm198in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 1,921mm76in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,060mm120in | 2,890mm114in |
| Front track | - | 1,646mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 235mm9in | 167mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 632L | 854L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,158L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 269g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW |
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8 has 16 hp more than Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 3.7 s |
Although Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8 has more power, Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh and Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | 534 hp 398 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinDBX4.0 V8 | TeslaModel YPerformance 80.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 534 hp 398 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,245 kg 4,949 lb | 1,995 kg 4,398 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 269 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 632 L 22.3 cu ft | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin DBX 4.0 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model Y Performance 80.5 kWh
- Is 250 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 222 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























