Ariel Atom 4
Car comparison
Ariel Atom 4 2.0vsAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ariel Atom 4 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Lightest595 kg1,312 lb
- Best power-to-weight538 hp/t401 kW/t1.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score79/100
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ArielAtom 42.0 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 595kg1,312lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 30.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 57.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.1s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 538hp/t401kW/t244hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 706Nm/t472lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 698km434mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 3,520mm139in | 4,198mm165in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,842mm73in |
| Height | 1,122mm44in | 1,348mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,390mm94in | 2,468mm97in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,546mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 250L |
| Doors | - | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ariel Atom 4 2.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 5,400-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ArielAtom 42.0 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.1 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 222 km/h 138 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI has 20 hp more than Ariel Atom 4 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Ariel Atom 4 2.0 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 595 kg 1,312 lb |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 2.8 s |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 4.4 s |
Although AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI has more power, Ariel Atom 4 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ariel Atom 4 2.0 and AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 538 hp/t 401 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 | 320 hp 239 kW | 2.8 s | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ArielAtom 42.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ArielAtom 42.0 | AUDITT RS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 280 km/h174 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 595 kg 1,312 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 698 km 434 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 538 hp/t 401 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ariel Atom 4 2.0
- Is 940 kg lighter
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 316 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI TT RS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.5 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























