Apollo IE
Car comparison
Apollo IE 6.3 V12vsMcLaren 765LT 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren 765LT
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Apollo IE 6.3 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful780 hp582 kW
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight624 hp/t465 kW/t1.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score97/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score39/100
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | ApolloIE6.3 V12 | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 780hp582kW | 765hp570kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,250kg2,756lb | 1,339kg2,952lb |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 33.4s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 35.4s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.8s Calculated | 7.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 9.8s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 624hp/t465kW/t283hp/1000 lb Calculated | 571hp/t426kW/t259hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 608Nm/t407lb-ft/ton Calculated | 597Nm/t400lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,300cc384cu in | 3,994cc244cu in |
| Length | 5,066mm199in | 4,600mm181in |
| Width | 1,995mm79in | 2,045mm81in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,159mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,678mm66in | 1,656mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | 1,612mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Apollo IE 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
- McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ApolloIE6.3 V12 | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 23.7 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 245 km/h 153 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 780 hp 582 kW |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW |
Apollo IE 6.3 V12 has 15 hp more than McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8 and Apollo IE 6.3 V12: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 2.7 s |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Apollo IE 6.3 V12 and McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 624 hp/t 465 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 571 hp/t 426 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 | 780 hp 582 kW | 2.7 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | 765 hp 570 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ApolloIE6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLaren765LT4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ApolloIE6.3 V12 | McLaren765LT4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 780 hp 582 kW | 765 hp 570 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | 1,339 kg 2,952 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 624 hp/t 465 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | 571 hp/t 426 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Apollo IE 6.3 V12
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 89 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
McLaren 765LT 4.0 V8
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























