Car comparison

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8vsAlpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari 348 TB

3.4 V8

300 hp3405 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1989-1993
VS

Alpine A610

3.0 i V6 Turbo

250 hp2975 ccGasolineRWDManualTurbochargedCoupe1991-1995

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    275 km/h
    171 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,393 kg
    3,071 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    215 hp/t
    161 kW/t
    4.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    200 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo

  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.2 L/100 km
    25.6 mpg US
    30.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    870 km
    540 mi
  • Best economy score
    82/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrari348 TB3.4 V8AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
300hp224kW
250hp186kW
Torque
324Nm239lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,393kg3,071lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
265 km/h
165 mph
To 99% top speed
77.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph
Calculated
75.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
18.5s
Calculated
19.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
13.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb
Calculated
176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
760km472mi
Calculated
870km540mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,405cc208cu in
2,975cc182cu in
Length
4,230mm167in
4,410mm174in
Width
1,894mm75in
1,760mm69in
Height
1,170mm46in
1,180mm46in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,340mm92in
Front track
1,502mm59in
1,505mm59in
Rear track
1,578mm62in
1,470mm58in
Trunk volume
200L
90L
Max trunk volume-
220L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
95L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 TurboPowerTorque
  • Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V87,200 rpm4,200 rpm7,450 rpm
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo5,750 rpm2,900 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrari348 TB3.4 V8AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.5 s
19.7 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
265 km/h
165 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
173 km/h
107 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
300 hp
224 kW
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 has 50 hp more than Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
324 Nm
239 lb-ft
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
1,393 kg
3,071 lb
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
275 km/h
171 mph
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
265 km/h
165 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V85.6 s
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo5.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
760 km
472 mi
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
870 km
540 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
300 hp
224 kW
5.6 s
275 km/h
171 mph
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW
5.7 s
265 km/h
165 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
90 L
3.2 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
265 km/h
165 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
5.6 s
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrari348 TB3.4 V8AlpineA6103.0 i V6 Turbo
Power
300 hp
224 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
324 Nm
239 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
5.7 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
265 km/h
165 mph
Lightness
1,393 kg
3,071 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
90 L
3.2 cu ft
Length
4,410 mm
173.6 in
Height
1,180 mm
46.5 in
Range score
760 km
472 mi
870 km
540 mi
Trunk score
200 L
7.1 cu ft
90 L
3.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
176 hp/t
131 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo
Consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.88 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.20 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,281 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Is 27 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 110 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo

  • Has 26 Nm more
  • Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 110 km (68 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.4 V8
3.4 V8
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrari348 TS3.4 V8
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.5 Turbo S CAT
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsPorsche9442.5 Turbo S CAT
3.4 V8
3.4 V8
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrari348 GTS3.4 V8
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.2i Turbo 20V
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsAUDIS2 Coupe2.2i Turbo 20V
3.4 V8
3.4 V8
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrari348 Spider3.4 V8
3.0 i V6 Turbo
3.0 Twin Turbo
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsNissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo
3.4 V8
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V
3.0 i V6 Turbo
3.0i
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.0i
3.4 V8
3.2 V8
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrari328 GTB3.2 V8
3.0 i V6 Turbo
3.0 i 24V 4x4
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsMitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4
3.4 V8
4.9 i V12 48V
VS
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8vsFerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V
3.0 i V6 Turbo
2.8 24V Biturbo
VS
AlpineA6103.0 i V6 TurbovsMaseratiGhibli II2.8 24V Biturbo
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 vs Alpine A610 3.0 i V6 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster