Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0vsAlpine A110 R 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpine A110
R 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best estimated range674 km419 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Alpine A110 R 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Lightest1,082 kg2,385 lb
- Best power-to-weight277 hp/t207 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110R 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,082kg2,385lb |
| Gross weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,316kg2,901lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 49.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.2s | 11.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 277hp/t207kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 314Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 652km405mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,530mm178in | 4,256mm168in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,238mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,420mm95in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | 106mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Alpine A110 R 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 6,300 rpm | 2,400-6,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110R 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.2 s | 11.8 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has 85 hp more than Alpine A110 R 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 R 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 1,082 kg 2,385 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.0 s |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 3.9 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has more power, Alpine A110 R 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 R 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 R 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 277 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 674 km 419 mi |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 652 km 405 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.0 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 3.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpineA110R 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpineA110R 1.8 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 R 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110R 1.8 | 277 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110R 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,082 kg 2,385 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 652 km 405 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 277 hp/t 207 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 | Alpine A110 R 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpine A110 R 1.8
- Is 423 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























